Fee Overview
horse.fun allocates 5% of total entry volume to protocol operations:The total allocation is 100% of entry volume: 90% to direct prizes, 4% to jackpots, 1% to the HORSE buyback-and-burn, and 5% to protocol operations. Players receive 95% (90% prizes + 4% jackpots + 1% buyback value).
Fee Allocation
The 5% protocol fee is split into two parts:Referral Rewards
Up to 1% of total volumePaid to users who refer new players
Protocol Operations
4-5% of total volumeDevelopment, maintenance, and treasury
Detailed Breakdown
From total entry volume (100%):Protocol Treasury Usage
The 4-5% protocol fee funds sustainable operations:Development
Development
- Smart contract development and improvements
- Frontend and user interface
- Bug fixes and optimizations
Infrastructure
Infrastructure
- RPC costs for Solana blockchain
- VRF oracle fees for randomness
- Website hosting
Operations
Operations
- Protocol maintenance
- Technical support
- Treasury reserves
Referral System
Up to 1% of entry volume is allocated to referral rewards:How It Works
Calculation
Referral rewards come from the protocol’s 5% fee allocation, not from the player’s direct winnings.
Fee Sustainability
Why 5%?
The protocol needs sustainable revenue to:- Cover operational costs (VRF, infrastructure, development)
- Fund continuous development (new features, improvements)
- Support growth (marketing, community)
- Build reserves (emergency funds, insurance)
Volume-Based Sustainability
Protocol revenue scales directly with entry volume:- ✅ All infrastructure and development
- ✅ Marketing and community growth
- ✅ Treasury reserves for long-term stability
Revenue depends on actual game activity. Higher volume = higher protocol sustainability.
Transparency
On-Chain Verification
All fee collection is verifiable on-chain:- Every race’s fee deduction is recorded
- Treasury wallet addresses are public
- Fee distribution is transparent
- Anyone can verify anytime
Treasury Wallet
- Solscan.io
- Solana Beach
- Solana Explorer
Comparison to Alternative Models
Why Not 0% Fees?
Q: Why not make the protocol free? A: Zero fees would mean:- ❌ No funding for development or improvements
- ❌ No oracle payments (VRF costs money)
- ❌ No infrastructure maintenance
- ❌ Unsustainable long-term
Why Not Token Incentives Instead?
Some protocols subsidize fees with token emissions. Problems:- ❌ Token inflation dilutes holders
- ❌ Unsustainable when incentives end
- ❌ Attracts mercenary users
- ❌ Token price volatility affects protocol viability
- ✅ Sustainable fee-based model
- ✅ Volume-linked token emission (no fixed inflation)
- ✅ Deflationary jackpot burns + 1% buyback-and-burn
- ✅ Long-term viability
Player Impact
Net Impact on Returns
With the allocation model:Next Steps
Pari-Mutuel System
Understand how the 95% player pool is distributed
Economic Analysis
Complete breakdown of protocol economics
Jackpots
Understand how 4% of total volume funds jackpots
Payouts
See how winnings are calculated
